Thomas Paine and Common Sense :: Papers

Thomas Paine and Common SenseIn early 1776 the sentiment meet the idea of revolution was evenly divided in Britains colonies in America. The feelings were split evenly between those for a revolt, those opposing it and those who were neutral. In January 1776 Thomas Paine wrote Common Sense. The ideas and theories express in the pamphlet were very compelling and thorough. Compelling enough to sway much of the undecided colonists to agree that revolt is the necessary course of action. Paine states in the presentment to Common Sense a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at fist a salmagundiidable outcry in defense of custom. This argument is not one of listing injustices or even tenablenesss for revolt but it does provoke the lecturer to decide if his thoughts are genuine or from not thinking critically about the times and situations. Now that we my suffer ourselves to examine the component parts of the side Constitution, the faults shall be found. Paine argues one theoretical position that could influence those loyal to the King himself. If the British constitution is a system of checks and balances and the commons are the check on the king then this infers, That the king is not to be trusted. This brings to light an underlying fault with the way the British system of government is arranged. Paine is against a divided form of government. He feels that simpler government is best. That way the people know whom to hold responsible. He also feels the king did not get better with the creation of a put up government only subtle. He later states that the system, hath all the distinctions of an house divided against itself. He then again makes the argument that the loyalists aim not opened their eyeball to the faults of the British form of government. Paine says that those in favor of the current form of government feel that way more from national pride than reason. Paine conten ds that there is no reason to feel loyalty to Britain. He feels that all the actions of Britain are in its self-interest. He feels the colonies would not need defending if Britain would not bring its enemies to the colonies. There would not have been a French and Indian war because the colonies would not be enemies of the French.